This feels very much like a scaled-down black-ops version of the 9/11 Muslim demonization script. I feel it is either a false flag, or a false flag combined with hoax elements. In many regards, I lean toward a large measure of hoax.
A serious question: what exactly are we looking at here?
The overall narrative can be viewed in this ABC News clip. As you go through the images you will notice little that indicates hundreds of dead and wounded. Instead, you see a staging impression mostly involving the presence of large numbers of police and street activity.
ABC News gives us an idea about the official story and is pushing an ISIS sleeper-cell narrative. Now ISIS is supposedly claiming credit for these attacks at six locations in Paris. Eight terrorists are dead, seven by their own hand using creepy-sounding, hide- your-women-and-children “suicide vests.” Allegedly 1,700 individuals in France are on the “ISIS tract.” Much of this is pushed on ABC News by a Zio Jew by the name of Martha Raddatz, who promotes the nightmare scenario of “soft targets” being hit by Zio-created ISIS boogeymen. She is shown spewing forth at 21:35.
At 25:35, an “eyewitness” named Charlotte Brehaut is rolled on the air at ABC. “Charlotte on the Spot” just happened to be sitting in a restaurant “when shots rang out” and “windows were shattered.” A closer peak behind the curtain reveals that Ms. Brehaut is far from a random Paris eyewitness. Her job, according to LinkedIn, is assistant producer for ZOG-owned France 24. She is originally British, and her job description includes “script writing.”
Also watch the “injured” being rolled out, especially the smiling, happy guy sitting up on the gurney and giving the Victory sign at 2:50. “Horrifying.”
Another eyewitness, Nicolas, is shown here giving an interview on the street and looking no worse for the wear after being shot in the arm.
This is the closest you will get to one of the invisible “terrorists.”
There were 1,500 people in the Bataclan theater, where most of the dead (100?) and injured were reported, but where are the images and downloads? That is a huge smoking gun in an affluent city with millions of advanced camera and communication devices.
Yet, as the following examples show, little has emerged but low-quality Dealey Plaza-era imagery. I refuse to believe that this is 2015 or even 2005 film quality. I call hoax when I see it constantly. Here are night video tests on the older generation 2012 iPhone 4s and Galaxy s3 cameras. The quality is not even remotely as problematic or as poor as what we are getting from Paris. The second video is the current generation iPhone 6s taken at a dark night club. First class technology, better than my old eyesight.
Another smoking gun is the complete lack of substantive CCTV video so far.
Here is one bizarre, poor-quality, Bataclan video that emerged of people rushing from the theater. Several are down at the doorway, and several more injured are being dragged off. To top off the surrealism, a woman is hanging like Spider Man from the window. The shouting and yelling seems out of context with the action, especially after the crowd clears out.
The soccer stadium scene of people on the field just looking confused and perplexed after the pyrotechnic device went off doesn’t compute. Where was the carnage in the stands? Why wasn’t the camera turned on that? The ABC reporter has a hard time making sense of this as well calling it a “very bizarre situation.”
Lots of other squirrely and low-quality clips from this event so far. This next one looks contrived. Lady with “injured” leg up in the air? Really? View is obstructed, dark and grainy in typical hoax style. Why do filmers set up in poor locations and shoot into backs and rear ends? Step a few feet right and get a clear view. And why not run the camera for more than 12 seconds? And what’s with the laughter right at the end?
Par for the course, here’s jerky, grainy, poor-quality, Dealey Plaza circa 1963 video starting at 0:45 and ending at 0:54. Not exactly sure what it shows other than just some confusion.
Photo of guy with bloodied shirt who looks little worse for the wear.
Looks like this cameraman was trying to zero in on some substance, a form or activity on the ground, but was chased off by security. Per usual, the line of sight to the person or object is blocked.
Another bizarre eyewitness video flipped on its side. Film quality is a bit better but really is more for effect, and doesn’t show anything of substance. There is so much of this no-substance distraction for-effect filming going on that only the most hardened conspiracy researcher would carry on.
Another example of worthless, poor-quality, no-substance video getting lots of play. The cameraman can’t hold still and focus on anything revealing whatsoever.
